"there is evidence that these AI detection tools work less well on authors who didn’t learn English as their first language"
Though, this is the one thing I wanted to point out needs some context. Yes, it's true that AI detectors have a history of this sort of colonial bias. However, Pangram, notably, doesn't work that same way as pretty much every other detector. In fact, it's had verified studies by two universities that its false positive rate for these kind of CALD writing is, essentially, zero.
Anyway, I love in this how you've reverse engineered this problem. Trying to write more AI to be detected as AI is something i've not seen elsewhere. And yeah... this is what I've thought often - isn't claiming your writing is often detected as AI kind of saying you write very generically?
And is it fair to say that, in a world where anyone could have generated their writing with a click of a button, it behooves you to demonstrate your writing is genuine human?
I feel like we've crossed a threshold here where if your writing just *happens* to sounds robotic and that same winking, meaningful meaninglessness tone that AI writing produces... gee you really ought to go out of your way to show your notes or something, right?
As a person over 40, I cannot read any of the yellow text.
Also, your meal looks amazing and I welcome all meal photos you choose to post.
I am constantly reminded how much I do and should hate AI
This is great.
"there is evidence that these AI detection tools work less well on authors who didn’t learn English as their first language"
Though, this is the one thing I wanted to point out needs some context. Yes, it's true that AI detectors have a history of this sort of colonial bias. However, Pangram, notably, doesn't work that same way as pretty much every other detector. In fact, it's had verified studies by two universities that its false positive rate for these kind of CALD writing is, essentially, zero.
Anyway, I love in this how you've reverse engineered this problem. Trying to write more AI to be detected as AI is something i've not seen elsewhere. And yeah... this is what I've thought often - isn't claiming your writing is often detected as AI kind of saying you write very generically?
And is it fair to say that, in a world where anyone could have generated their writing with a click of a button, it behooves you to demonstrate your writing is genuine human?
I feel like we've crossed a threshold here where if your writing just *happens* to sounds robotic and that same winking, meaningful meaninglessness tone that AI writing produces... gee you really ought to go out of your way to show your notes or something, right?